![]() But if it were to be flagged as a PUP, I would just add it to the exclusions - since I know I want to keep it. I have CCleaner installed and it passes the PUP detection unscathed. And although some reg cleaners have a good reputation, there are a many more that would be considered "definitely" unwanted, by users, if they knew what was really going on behind the reg cleaning, optimizing facade.Īnd from what I can see, it's not targeting all reg cleaners, only those which have a poor reputation. It's only classifying certain software as "potentially" unwanted. If you read the thread Firefox linked to (above) you'll see that MBam are letting the people decide what should or shouldn't be considered a potentially unwanted program. I don't think it's political or a big brother tactic. If you don't like reg cleaners, driver updaters, torrenting apps, then don't install them. Misclassifying software due to personal bias is an integrity issue. Turning off PUPs detections drops protection from real PUPs as well as imagined PUPs. Some may be, but not because they are registry cleaners. Declaring that registry cleaners are PUPs goes beyond subjective.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |